CAN SUBSIDIES DISPLACE THE NEED TO IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY AS A SOURCE OF INCOME MAXIMIZATION? EVIDENCE FROM POLAND

Main Article Content

Aleksandra Pawłowska
Wlodzimierz Rembisz


Keywords : economic rent, political rent, labour productivity, agricultural policy, counterfactual method, inverse probability of treatment weighting
Abstract

Aim: The article addresses the fundamental issue of agricultural producers’ choice regarding two sources of income maximisation, i.e. economic rent resulting improving labour productivity and political rent as an expression of the institutional conditions in force. In particular, attention is focused on the possible substi­tutability between economic and political rents. Methods: The effect of displacement of economic rent by political rent was measured for Polish farms by economic size class in the period 2008–2015, using inverse probability of treatment weighting, based on a counterfactual approach. Results: The study indicated that despite the fact that farms with improved labour productivity achieved higher incomes, in some years there was a significant displacement effect of the economic rent by the political rent. This meant that significantly higher incomes were earned by inefficient farms whose operations linked to production were supported by agricultural policy instruments than by unsubsidised farms where labour productivity increased. As farm size increased, the need to improve productivity was thus replaced more often and on a larger scale by the use of agricultural policy mechanisms. Conclusions: The results confirmed the conclusions of studies carried out in other countries, thus indicating the possible contribution of agricultural policy to undermining the need to improve productivity as a source of maximising agricultural income. So while farm incomes should be supported, if only because of the persistent disparity between incomes from agriculture and those from other sectors of the economy, there is still room for improvement in the efficiency of public expenditure allocation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pawłowska, A., & Rembisz, W. (2024). CAN SUBSIDIES DISPLACE THE NEED TO IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY AS A SOURCE OF INCOME MAXIMIZATION? EVIDENCE FROM POLAND. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 23(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.22630/ASPE.2024.23.1.2
References

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A. (2006). Economic Back¬wardness in Political Perspective. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 115–131. https://doi:10.1017/ S0003055406062046

Barnow, B.S., Cain, G.G., Goldberger A.S. (1980). Issues in the analysis of selectivity bias. [In:] E. Stromsdorfer, G. Farkas (eds.), Education studies, 5. SAGE Publication, Beverly Hills, 42–59.

Bergström, F. (2000). Capital subsidies and the performance of firms. Small Business Economics, 14, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008133217594

Blaug, M. (1994). Teoria ekonomii. Ujęcie retrospektywne (Economic theory. Retrospective view). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Bocian, M., Cholewa, I., Tarasiuk, R. (2014). Współczynni¬ki Standardowej Produkcji „2010” dla celów Wspól-notowej Typologii Gospodarstw Rolnych (Standard Output Coefficients „2010” for the purposes of the Community typology of agricultural holdings). IERiGŻ- PIB, Warszawa.

Ciaian, P., Swinnen, J.F.M. (2009). Credit market imperfec¬tions and the distribution of policy rents. American Jour¬nal of Agricultural Economics, 91, 1124–1139. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01311.x

Czyżewski, B. (2013). Renty ekonomiczne w gospodarcze żywnościowej w Polsce (Economic rents in the food economy in Poland). PWE, Warszawa.

Czyżewski, B., Matuszczak, A. (2016a). A new land rent the¬ory for sustainable agriculture. Land Use Policy, 55, 222– 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.002

Czyżewski, B., Matuszczak, A. (2016b). Interwencjonizm rolny: pogoń za rentą a wybór publiczny lub korygowan¬ie rynku (Agricultural interventionism: rent-seeking vs public choice or correcting market imperfections). Ekonomista, 5, 674–703.

Floriańczyk, Z., Osuch, D., Płonka, R. (2018). Wyniki Standardowe 2017 uzyskane przez gospodarstwa rolne uczestniczące w Polskim FADN. Część I. Wyniki Stan¬dardowe (Standard results 2017 obtained by farms par¬ticipating in the Polish FADN. Part I. Standard results). IERiGŻ-PIB, Warszawa.

Frank, R.H. (2009). Mikroekonomia jakiej jeszcze nie było (Microeconomics like never before). Gdańskie Wy-dawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.

Giannakas, K., Schoney, R., Tzouvelekas, V. (2001). Tech¬nical efficiency, technological change and output growth of wheat farms in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49, 135–152. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2001.tb00295.x

Guo, S., Fraser, M.W. (2015). Propensity Score Analysis. Statistical methods and applications/ SAGE Publication, Thousand Oaks.

Guyomard, H., Le Mouel, C., Gohin, A. (2004). Impacts of alternative agricultural income support schemes on multiple policy goals. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31, 125–148.

Hennessy, D.A. (1998). The Production Effects of Agricul¬tural Income Support Policies under Uncertainty. Amer¬ican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180267

Hindmoor, A. (1999). Rent Seeking Evaluated. The Jour¬nal of Political Philosophy, 7(4), 434–452. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-9760.00085

Holmes, W.M. (2014). Using Propensity Scores in Quasi- -Experimental Designs. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Imbens, G.W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 4–29. http://www.jstor. org/stable/3211657?origin=JSTOR-pdf

Latruffe, L. (2010). Competitiveness, Productivity and Effi¬ciency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers 30. OECD Publishing, Paris.

Latruffe, L., Guyomard, H., Le Mouel, C. (2009). The role of public subsidies on farms’ managerial efficiency: An application of a five-stage approach to France. Working Paper SMART-LERECO 09-05, Rennes.

Leite, W. (2017). Practical propensity score methods using R. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Mahoney, J.T. (1995). The Management of Resource and Resource of Management. Journal of Business Re¬search, 33(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148- 2963(94)00060-R

Mary, S. (2013). Assessing the impacts of Pillar 1 and 2 subsidies on TFP in French crop farms. Journal of Agri-cultural Economics, 64(1), 133–144.

McCaffrey, D.F., Griffin, B.A., Almirall, D., Slaughter, M.E., Ramchand, R., Burgette, L.F. (2013). A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments us¬ing generalized boosted models. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3388–3414.

McChesney, F.S. (1998). Rent form regulation. [In:] P. New¬man (ed.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, 3. Macmillan, London, 310–315.

Murphy, K., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. (1993). Why Is Rent- -Seeking So Costly to Growth? American Economic Re-view, 83, 409–414.

Pan, W., Bai, H. Propensity Score Analysis. Fundamentals and Developments. The Guilford Press, New York.

Poczta-Wajda, A. (2018). Polityka wspierania rolnictwa a problem deprywacji dochodowej rolników w krajach o różnym poziomie rozwoju (Agricultural support pol¬icies and the problem of income deprivation of farmers in countries with different levels of development). Wy¬dawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Ratinger, T., Medonos, T., Hruska, M. (2013). An assess¬ment of the differentiated effects of the investment support to agricultural modernisation: The case of the Czech Republic. AGRIS On-line Papers on Economics and Informatics, 5, 53–164.

Rembisz, W. (2017). Mikroekonomiczne podstawy wzrostu dochodów producentów rolnych (Microeconomic bases of income growth of agricultural producers). VIZJA PRESS&IT, Warszawa.

Rizov, M., Pokrivcak, J., Ciaian, P. (2013). CAP Sub¬sidies and Productivity of the EU Farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 537–557. https://doi. org/10.1111/1477-9552.12030

Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi. org/10.2307/2335942

Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1990). Strategy, Complexity and Eco¬nomic Rent. Management Science, 36(10), 1178–1192.

Sckokai, P., Moro, D. (2009). Modelling the impact of the CAP Single Farm Payment on farm investment and output. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36(3), 395–423.

Stiglitz, J.E. (2004). Ekonomia sektora publicznego (Econom¬ics of the public sector). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Teng, J. (2013). A Theory of Complementarity between Rent Seeking and Production. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.2246208

Tollison, R.D. (1982). Rent seeking: a survey. Kyklos, 35, 575– –602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1982.tb00174.x

Wilkin J. (2012). Pogoń za rentą za pomocą mechanizmów politycznych (The rent-seeking through political mecha-nisms). [In:] J. Wilkin (ed.), Teoria wyboru publicznego. Wstęp do ekonomicznej analizy polityki i funkcjonowa¬nia sfery publicznej. Scholar, Warszawa, 221–237.

Zhu, X., Lansink, A.O. (2010). Impact of CAP subsidies on technical efficiency of crop farms in Germany, the Nether¬lands and Sweden. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 545–564.

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Recommend Articles